Introduction: The aim was to construct a tool to assess the overall self-care of an individual and to determine the correlation of the collected data with a 15- day interval for the validation of the specially designed datasheet in a semiurban population in West Bengal.
Materials and methods: This cross-sectional study comprised structured questions on overall self-care (CARE) related topics for individuals within a specific population, focusing on socio-demographic variables. Oral healthrelated behavior was assessed in 25 study subjects aged 2-80 years attending a dental clinic in Sonarpur, West Bengal, India. Data was recorded with a specially designed questionnaire in written form. Statistical analysis was carried out to determine the distribution of variables related to lifestyle and assess the correlation of the determinants by evaluating the kappa value.
Results: The study subject population includes various ages, from that of a child (over 2 years who can consciously speak with understanding the situation) to older age (80 years); both gender; employed or unemployed; with or without education; any income; any socioeconomic status; high, moderate or poor lifestyles, for evaluation of their overall self-care. All the social, personal and family related data evaluated in the same subjects with a same evaluator (PI) and the same datasheet along with necessary consent or assent, in a 15 days interval and the statistical evaluation indicates at the data set or questionnaire set is statistically valid with a kappa value (k) of ‘1’ or ‘close to 1’.
Conclusion: Patients’ involvement in overall self-care, including promoting healthy habits, accepting community-aided assistance, and maintaining a balanced diet, leads to a generally good lifestyle. These self-care regulatory factors along with parental or caregivers care, judicial use of potable water, proper use of toilet, use of mosquito net, availability of emergency health assessment and restoration kit like thermometer, emergency medicines, blood pressure machine in a proximity to the house may help to improve or protect their overall self-health for future. This validated and statistically significant ‘The Sonarpur Model’ may be used as a measurement tool or an instrument for further studies, and, to the best of our knowledge, this study is the first study to assess the overall self-care of an individual.
Keywords: Community benefits, lifestyle, overall self-care, Overall SelfCare Index, The Sonarpur Model.
1. Reinhard SC et al. Patient Safety Qual An Evidence-Based Handbook for Nurses. 2008. [PMID: 21328752]
2. Hughes N et al. Soc Sci Med. 2013; 96:78-85. [DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.07.023], [PMID: 24034954]
3. Groenou MB. Aging Soc. 2006; 26:745-766. [DOI: 10.1017/S0144686X06005241]
4. Chadda RK et al. Indian J Psychiatry. 2013;55(Suppl 2): S299-309. [DOI: 10.4103/0019-5545.105555]
5. Brémault-Phillips S et al. Springerplus. 2016;5(1). [DOI:10.1186/s40064-016-2244-z]
6. Qiu X et al. J Clin Nurs. 2018. [PMID: 33607793]
7. National Center on Caregiving. Family Caregiver Alliance. 2015. [DOI:10.1080/15398285.2019.1581006]
8. Guerriere DN et al. National Alliance for Caregiving; 2010. [DOI: 10.1177/0269216312473171]
9. Richard PB et al. Residential Treatment For Children & Youth. 2024;41(1):24-46. [DOI: 10.1080/0886571X.2023.2202889]
10. Denham AMJ et al. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0243502. [DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243502]
11. Laaksonen M et al. Eur J Public Health. 2005;15:262–269. [PMID: 15755781]
12. Liu Q et al. Int J Qual Health Care. 2011;23:405–412. [DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzr021]
13. Liu YB et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015;12(8):9714-9725. [DOI: 10.3390/ijerph120809714]
14. Winkleby MA et al. Prev Med. 1990;19:1–12. [DOI:10.1016/0091-7435(92)90067-R]
15. Hooley M et al. J Dent. 2012 Nov;40(11):873-85. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2012.07.013]
16. Laaksonen M et al. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(8):1403-9. [DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.047969]
17. Camargo MB et al. Rev Saude Publica. 2012;46:87–97. [PMID: 22218761]
18. Edelstein BL. Ambul Pediatr. 2002;2:141–147. [PMID: 11950385]
19. Rajab LD et al. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2002;12:168–176. [PMID: 32515430]
20. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. National Health Policy. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India; 2017:31.
21. SM Hossain et al. Malar J. 2011 Dec 13;10:357. [DOI: 10.1186/1475-2875-10-357], [PMID: 22165959]
22. SBM-ph-II-Guidelines.pdf. Swachh Bharat Mission. 2020. [ Available from: https://swachhbharatmission.ddws.gov.in/]
23. Centre on Housing Rights and Evictions. Sanitation: A Human Rights Imperative. COHRE; 2008. [Available from: https://sswm.info/sites/default/files/reference_attachments/COHRE%202008%20Sanitation%20a%20human%20rights%20imperative.pd f]
24. Singh A. A Study on Government of India Schemes and Initiatives: A Policy Perspective. 2023. [DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19282.94407]
25. Singla N, et al. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2020 Mar 5;10(2):189-195. [DOI: 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_293_19], [PMID: 32670908]
26. Richmond C. The Lancet. 2012;380(9838):212. [DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61206-9]
27. Breslow L et al. Prev Med. 1980;9(4):469-483. [DOI: 10.1016/0091-7435(80)90042-0] 28. Gómez-Zúñiga B et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 2;18(7):3724. [DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18073724]
29. Swinkels JC et al. Health Soc Care Community. 2022;30(4):e953-e961. [DOI: 10.1111/hsc.13497]
30. Guberman N. J Women Aging. 1999;11(1):85-102. [DOI: 10.1300/J074v11n01_07]
31. Durnford J et al. Early Child Dev Care. 2020;192:1-11. [DOI: 10.1080/03004430.2020.1832997]
32. Myruski S et al. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2019;14(9):947-956. [DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsz070]
33. Monin JK et al. J Health Psychol. 2019;24(12):1744-1755. [DOI: 10.1177/1359105317699682]
34. Sharma S et al. Int J Community Med Public Health. 2023;10(9):3311-3316. [DOI: 10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20232696]
35. Lawson RN. Can Med Assoc J. 1956;75:309-310. [PMID: 20327365]
36. Tkachenko O. A et al. Modern Electronic Materials, 6 (2), 59-64. [DOI 10.3897/j.moem.6.2.58576]
37. Kario K. Am J Hypertens. 2021;34(8):783-794. [DOI: 10.1093/ajh/hpab017]
38. Hansen K. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2020;20(2):101-110. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2008.09.002]
39. Nygren BL et al. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2016;94(5):1143-9. [DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0393], [PMID: 26928833]
40. Nirmalkumar K et al. Chettinad Health City Med J. 2024;13:30-35. [DOI: 10.24321/2278.2044.202441]
41. Fink G et al. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:428-436. [DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2112524]
42. Toda M et al. Soc Behav Pers. 2006;34:1277-1284. [DOI: 10.2224/sbp.2006.34.10.1277]
43. Bettio F et al. Long-term care for older people: provisions and providers in 33 European countries. 2012;10.2838/87307. [DOI: 10.2838/87307]
44. Zigante V. Informal care in Europe – Exploring formalisation, availability and quality. European Commission Publications Office; 2018. [DOI: 10.2767/78836]
45. Carman KL et al. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32(2):223-31. [DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1133]
46. Brown SL et al. Psychol Inq. 2006;17:1-29. [PMID: 19320860]
47. Maurer M et al. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(Suppl 1):6-13. [DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07104-w]
48. Barello S et al. BMC Public Health. 2019;19:1562. [DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7743-8]
49. Gentile JH et al. Sci Total Environ. 2001;274(1-3):231-253. [DOI: 10.1016/S0048-9697(01)00746-X]
50. Terwee CB et al. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(5):1159-1170. [DOI: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0]
51. Tabachnick B et al. Using Multivariate Statistics. 2007;3:402-407. [Available from: https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=1512372]
52. Steffen AM et al. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2002;57(1):74-86. [DOI: 10.1093/geronb/57.1.p74]
Partha B, Mohammad J, Poulami S, Somen B. Assessment of Overall Self-Care Among the East Indian Population: An Experimental, Observational, and Validated Study. Oral Sphere J Dent Health Sci. (2025); 1(3): 123-133. https://doi.org/10.63150/osjdhs.2025.9