Oral Sphere

Journal of Dental and Health Sciences

Rehabilitation of a Grossly Decayed Premolar with a Custom Modified Fibre Post and Zirconia Crown

Case Report

Abstract

Background: Using materials like metals and fiber-reinforced composites, intraradicular posts are frequently utilised to reconstruct teeth that have suffered severe loss of coronal structure. Metal posts are less favoured due to esthetic limitations and mechanical incompatibility with dentin. Prefabricated fibre posts often poorly adapt to irregular canal shapes, leading to cement voids and compromised retention. Customising fibre posts to canal anatomy improves fit, reduces cement thickness, and enhances long-term prognosis.

Case presentation: In this case study, a 53-year-old man with a severely decaying, previously endodontically treated upper right second premolar (tooth 15) exhibiting loss of crown structure and a periapical lesion is described as having been successfully managed. Clinical and radiographic evaluation confirmed no pain, swelling, or sinus tract. The tooth was isolated, and retreatment was initiated with canal cleaning, disinfection, and calcium hydroxide dressing, followed by obturation with AH Plus and gutta percha. A post space was prepared, and a prefabricated fibre post was customized using composite resin to replicate canal anatomy. A composite core was constructed after the relined post was light-cured and sealed with dual-cure resin cement. After a week, a zirconia crown was cemented. A three-month follow-up revealed outstanding post-adjustment and full periapical recovery.

Conclusion: Customizing prefabricated fibre posts to match root canal anatomy enhances retention, stress distribution, and preserves radicular dentin. This technique offers a minimally invasive, esthetic, and mechanically superior alternative to conventional posts. Long-term studies are needed to validate its clinical efficacy further.

Keywords: Anatomical post, Composite, Fibrepost, Zirconia

References
  1. Badami V, et al. Cureus. 2022 Sep 29;14(9). [DOI: 10.7759/cureus.. 29753]
  2. de Mendonça AF, et al. European Journal of Dental and Oral Health. 2021 Dec 4;2(6):5-12. [DOI 10.24018/ejdent.2021.2.6.117]
  3. Amaral FR et al. Scientific Journal of Dentistry. 2015;2(3):13-20. [DOI: 10.15713/ins.sjod.36]
  4. Satija R, et al. IP Indian Journal of Conservative and Endodontics. 2021;6(3):176-80. [DOI: 10.18231/j.ijce.2021.038]
  5. Mannocci F et al. Int Endod J. 2022 Oct;55 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):1059-1084. [DOI: 10.1111/iej.13796]
  6. Elsubeihi ES et al. The Open Dentistry Journal. 2020 Jun 26;14(1). [DOI: 10.2174/1874210602014010313]
  7. Sirimai S et al. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1999 Mar 1;81(3):262-9. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70267-2]
  8. Clavijo VG et al. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2009;17:574-8. [DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572009000600007]
  9. Jahnavi B et al. International Journal of Health Sciences and Research. 2017;7(7):370-375. [Available from: https://www.ijhsr.org/IJHSR_Vol.7_Issue.7_July2017/IJHSR_Abstract.051.html]
  10. Moosavi H et al. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2008 Jan 1;9(1):30-7. [DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-9-1-30.]
  11. D’Arcangelo C. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2007 Sep 1;98(3):193-8. [DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60055-9]
  12. Silva GR et al. Brazilian Dental Journal. 2011;22:230. [DOI: 10.1590/S0103-64402011000300009]
  13. Faria-e-Silva AL et al. Journal of Applied Oral Science. 2009;17:600-4. [DOI: 10.1590/S1678-77572009000600012]
  14. Rocha AT et al. International Journal of Dentistry. 2017;2017(1):5010712. [DOI: 10.1155/2017/5010712]
  15. Gomes GM et al. Operative Dentistry. 2016 Jan 1;41(1):E23-8. [DOI:10.2341/14-275-T]
  16. Nandini VV et al. The Journal of Indian Prosthodontic Society. 2007 Oct 1;7(4):199-202. [DOI: 10.4103/0972-4052.41073]
  17. Almohammed SN et al. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2024 Jan 1;37(1). [DOI: 10.11607/ijp.8171]
  18. Lee JH et al. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2014 Sep 1;112(3):683-5. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.01.015.]
  19. Das A et al. PLoS One. 2022;17(7):e0268356. [DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268356]
  20. Gunawan A et al. Indones J Appl Ind Sci. 2023;2(1):119–32. [DOI: 10.55927/esa.v2i1.2822]
  21. Giguère A et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;2020(8):CD004398. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd004398.pub4]
  22. Taherdoost H. Data Collection Methods and Tools for Research: A Step-by-Step Guide to Choose Data Collection Technique for Academic and Business Research Projects. Int J Acad Res Manag. 2021;10(1):10–38. [Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4178676]
  23. Van Quaquebeke N et al. Organ Psychol Rev. 2022;12(3):268–305. [DOI: 10.1177/20413866221097571]
  24. Więsyk PJ et al. Qual Sport. 2024;30:55218. [DOI: 10.12775/qs.2024.30.55218]
  25. Reddy SC et al. Nepal J Ophthalmol. 2013;5(2):161–8. [DOI: 10.3126/nepjoph.v5i2.8707]
  26. Uppili Venkat Ragavan U et al. Ann Med Health Sci Res. 2022;12(S1):169–76. [DOI: 10.54608.annalsmedical.2022.s1]
  27. Cacodcar JA et al. Epidemiol Int. 2021;6(1):9–14. [DOI: 10.24321/2455.7048.202102]