Oral Sphere
Journal of Dental and Health Sciences
Journal of Dental and Health Sciences
Received: 2025-06-10
Accepted: 2025-08-22
Published: 2025-10-01
Pages: 204-209
Background: In forensic odontology, age determination of living individuals as part of establishing identity is becoming increasingly crucial. Several studies suggest that assessing the morphological features of adult human teeth using orthopantomograms is more dependable than other approaches for estimating age. These studies require that some corrections be made for size variations in the magnification of radiographs and angulations between the X-ray beam and film. To overcome this problem, some researchers suggest using the pulp/tooth area ratio instead of their direct measurement.
Methodology: This study describes an orthopantogram-based method for the estimation of age in living individuals from single-rooted premolars. The reliability of this method was cross-checked by taking measurements from the same sectioned teeth.
Result: We found that the radiographs were able to predict the age with 70% accuracy, and the tooth sections were able to predict the age with 73% accuracy. As there was a strong correlation of 85% between the two methods, they are similar in predicting the age of an individual.
Conclusion: We concluded that the radiographic method using orthopantomograms is a dependable non-invasive method for the estimation of age in living adult individuals.
Keywords: Dental pulp, Dental radiography, Forensic Dentistry, Premolar
1. Blenkin MRB et al. Master’s Thesis, The University of Sydney, 2005. [Available from:https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/669]
2. Kvaal SI et al. Forensic Science International. 1995 Jul 28;74(3):175-85. [DOI: 10.1016/0379-0738(95)01760-g]
3. Cunha E et al. Forensic Sci Int 2009;193:1-13. [DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.09.008]
4. Cameriere R et al. Forensic Sci. Int. 2011;206:132–135. [DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.07.025]
5. Aschmeling et al. Forensic Sci Int 2006;159:s61-4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.02.017]
6. Kapoor N et al. Age estimation from tooth-pulp area ratio: A preliminary study. La Revue de Médecine Légale 2020;11(1):11-14. [DOI: 10.1016/j.medleg.2019.11.003]
7. Cameriere R et al. J Forensic Sci 2004;49:317-9. [PMID: 15027553]
8. Cameriere R et al. Forensic Science International. 2012;214(1-3):105-12. [DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.07.028] [PMID: 21821373]
9. Singaraju S et al. Age estimation using pulp/tooth area ratio: A digital image analysis. Journal of Forensic Dental Sciences 2009;1(1):37-41. [DOI: 10.4103/0974-2948.50888]
10. Babshet M et al. Forensic Science International. 2010;197:125.e1–125.e4. [DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.12.065] [PMID: 20106616]
11. Panchbhai AS. Dental radiographic indicators, a key to age estimation. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 May;40(4):199-212. [PMID: 21493876]
12. Molina A et al. Int J Legal Med. 2021;135(1):359-364. [DOI: 10.1007/s00414-020-02377-y]
13. Star H et al. J Forensic Sci 2011;56(1):S77-S82. [DOI: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2010.01633.x]
14. Rai A et al. J Forensic Dent Sci 2016;8(3):150-154. [DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.195118]
15. Andrade VM et al. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48(7):20190053. [DOI: 10.1259/dmfr.20190053]
16. Juneja M et al. J Forensic Dent Sci 2014;6:160-65. [DOI: 10.4103/0975-1475.137047]
17. Muralidhar NV et al. J Orofac Sci 2021;13:114-20. [DOI: 10.4103/jofs.jofs_232_21]
